Artistic and Inspirational Influences vs. Drawing Fundamentals: Which one counts more when developing a 2D Animators visual Style?
You can finally draw. One of the greatest accomplishments for anyone working or looking to grow in the visual arts.
You gain compliments, some praise and even some awards. Finally, you look at several other artists work, as you have gained a good level of skills, but then the more you look around, the more you keep wondering if you will ever keep up, and then, in a moment, you suddenly start to ask, what exactly is my style?
One of the most common questions among aspiring and intermediate 2D animators is deceptively simple:
“How do I develop my own style?”
The answers are often frustratingly polarized.
Some argue that style only emerges
after years of mastering fundamentals. Others insist that studying your
influences is the real key, and that fundamentals merely polish what already
exists. For many 2D animators, this tension creates paralysis, which can be triggering in a young animation artists career. Another famous aspect of trying to get your style is whether should you be
copying your favorite artists, or drilling walk cycles and anatomy studies.
The
truth, so far in this ongoing question by animation artists, is less dramatic, but far more useful, in that, visual style in 2D animation is
not born from choosing between influences and fundamentals, but from how the
two interact over time.
What
“Style” Means in 2D Animation
In 2D animation, style is often mistaken for surface-level aesthetics, which include line quality, character proportions, or whether something looks “cartoony” or “realistic.” Actually one of the most, common and often recurring scenarios, in a visual artist or 2D Animators growth, is trying to mimic trendy styles from animated shows, and make it their own study in order to have visual appeal, in their "style".
In reality, visual style is deeper and more structural.
Style in 2D animation shows up in:
- How characters are constructed
- What shapes dominate designs
- How motion is exaggerated or restrained
- Timing preferences (snappy vs. fluid)
- Emotional tone and appeal
Most
importantly, style is consistent decision-making. Two animators can
understand the same fundamentals and still make radically different choices.
Style is the pattern that emerges from those choices.
The
Role of Fundamentals in 2D Animation
Fundamentals in 2D animation include:
- Drawing and construction
- Anatomy and gesture
- Timing and spacing
- Weight and balance
- Staging and clarity
- Appeal and silhouette
These
fundamentals do not dictate what your animation should look like, but
they heavily influence how well it communicates.
A 2D animator without fundamentals may still produce work that looks stylish, but it often suffers from:
- Inconsistent proportions
- Unclear motion
- Unintentional stiffness or "floatiness"
- Limited emotional range
Fundamentals
act as structural integrity. They allow animators to push, break, and
bend rules intentionally. Without them, stylistic quirks are fragile and they often collapse under complexity or longer productions.
The
Role of Influences in 2D Animation
If
fundamentals are structure, influences are direction.
Influences tell you:
- What kinds of characters excite you
- What emotional tones resonate
- What visual languages feel “right”
- What exaggerations feel satisfying
In 2D animation, influence is unavoidable. Every animator absorbs motion ideas, posing styles, and design philosophies from:
- Films and TV animation
- Comics and illustration
- Games
- Cultural art traditions
- Other animators online
Importantly,
influence rarely works through perfect copying. Style often emerges from misinterpretation, trying
to replicate something you admire, but doing it through your own limitations,
preferences, and understanding.
Case
Study: Aaron Blaise and the Foundation of Style
Aaron
Blaise is often cited as an example of a “strong personal style,” but his
career reveals something more nuanced.
Blaise’s work, particularly in films like Brother Bear and Beauty and the Beast, are perfect examples of style which is rooted in:
- Strong anatomical knowledge
- Clear gesture and weight
- Observational drawing from life
His
distinctive style did not emerge from rejecting fundamentals, but from deeply
internalizing them and filtering them through his love of wildlife,
realism, and expressive acting.
When
Blaise exaggerates motion or simplifies forms, it feels intentional because the
underlying structure is sound. His influences, such as classical Disney animation,
nature documentaries and animal anatomy, shape what he emphasizes, while
fundamentals ensure clarity and appeal.
Below is a link to Aaron Blaise's tips on character design which touch on the aspect of learning your fundamentals to being able to stylize.
Aaron Blaise's tips on stylization
One of the most common recurring patterns in great 2D animators, often involves realizing that style is not a replacement for
fundamentals, but a lens through which they are applied.
How
Style Actually Develops Over Time
Rather
than a binary choice, style development follows a rough progression:
Early Stage: Influence-Led Exploration
- Heavy imitation
- Inconsistent fundamentals
- Rapid stylistic shifts
- Learning what you like
At
this stage, copying is not failure, it is data collection.
Middle Stage: Fundamentals as a Filter
- Better understanding of structure
- More intentional exaggeration
- Recognition of recurring tendencies
- Growing consistency
Here,
fundamentals start shaping which influences stick and which fall away.
Advanced Stage: Style as Intentional Design
- Clear visual language
- Adaptable style across projects
- Conscious limitation and exaggeration
- Strong authorial voice
At
this point, style becomes something you use, not something you chase.
The
Real Answer to the Question
So, do
influences help develop style more than fundamentals?
Influences determine direction. This means, the influences around you, are only there to help you get a guiding light as you navigate your way to your own artistic taste and sensibilities in terms of how you embrace your drawings.
Fundamentals determine control. This means they are the root and with it your influences can now latch on to your developed understandings of the necessary core skills that make a 2D Animator.
In
2D animation, style is what happens when taste meets skill. One without the
other leads to either hollow polish or expressive chaos.
Practical
Advice for 2D Animators
As a final note to the 2D Animators out there trying to find their way through this maze.
- Study fundamentals while engaging with influences
- Analyze what specifically you like in other artists’ work
- Avoid waiting for “perfect fundamentals” before stylizing
- Let limitations guide early stylistic choices
- Revisit fundamentals as tools, not obstacles
Style is eventually discovered, by building it, layer by layer.

Comments
Post a Comment